Solvent composition for washing

ABSTRACT

At least one kind of solvent selected from among nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene and 3-methoxybutyl acetate is mixed to 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane to such an extent as not imparting any flammability. Also, propylene glycol based solvent(s) is mixed to 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane to such an extent as not imparting any flammability.

DESCRIPTION

1. Technical Field

The present invention relates to a solvent composition for cleaning thattakes 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane as a main ingredient and particularlyrelates to an art of improving the cleaning ability thereof.

2. Background Art

(Conventional Art)

Conventionally, chlorine-based solvents that fluorine-based solventshave been widely used as, for example, flux cleaners, solvents for drycleaning, degreasing cleaners, buffing cleaners, resist removing agents,or solvents for removing adhesion water. However, chlorine-basedsolvents are substances causing ground water pollution, andfluorine-based solvents are substances causing ozone layer depletion;because of their environmental problems, the use thereof is becomingrestricted. Therefore, there is a demand from various fields for a newsolvent that would taken place of the above-mentioned solvents.

1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365 mfc, chemical formula: C₄H₅F₅) is onesuch solvent (see, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-openPublication No. 5-171189, Japanese Patent Application Laid-openPublication No. 5-171190, Japanese Patent Application Laid-openPublication No. 6-322394, or Japanese Patent Application Laid-openPublication No. 7-188700). 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane has superiorcharacteristics in that it does not include chlorine in its molecularstructure, its ozone depletion potential (ODP) is zero, it is low intoxicity, its global warming potential (GWP) is also small, and thus itis ecological and clean.

(Conventional Problems)

However, 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365 mfc) has a problem in that itsKB value (kauri-butanol value) is approximately 14, which is extremelylow, and that it almost has no degreasing ability. If the KB value islow, it will not be possible to exert the sufficient cleaning abilityrequired of various kinds of cleaners.

Therefore, proposals have been made to increase the cleaning ability bymixing, to 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane, methylene chloride or1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane (HCFC-141b), which have a higher KB valueand degreasing-cleaning ability than the above (see publicationsJapanese Patent Application Laid-open Publication No. 5-171185 andJapanese Patent Application Laid-open Publication No. 11-152236).

However, since methylene chloride is highly toxic, there are concernsabout its band influence on the human body during execution of work.Therefore, use thereof is not only preferable, but there is also apossibility that it will become subjected to regulation in the futureand become difficult to use. Further, 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane (141b)has a high ozone depletion potential and is already subjected toregulation.

(OBJECT OF THE INVENTION)

The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and afirst object thereof is to obtain a solvent composition for cleaningthat takes 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane as a main ingredient and issuperior in cleaning ability, and particularly degreasing-cleaningability.

Objects and features of the present invention other than the above willbecome clear through the description of the present description and theappended drawings.

<DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION>

In order to accomplish the object mentioned above, the present inventiondisclosure a structure as follows.

The first structure of the present invention is characterized inincluding: (a) 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane; and (b) at least one kind ofsolvent selected from among nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and3-methoxybutyl acetate, and having no flammability.

Nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and 3-methoxybutyl acetate aresuch solvents found by the present inventor as to be suitable forincreasing the cleaning ability of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane. Thesesolvents have superior degreasing-cleaning abilities.

Further, the second structure of the present invention is characterizedin including: (a) 30 through 70 wt % of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane; and(b) 30 through 70 wt % of one kind of solvent or a mixed solventincluding at least two kinds of solvents selected from amongnitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and 3-methoxybutyl acetate.

The range of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane is set to 30 through 70 wt %and the range of one kind of solvent or a mixed solvent including atleast two kinds of solvents selected from among nitromethane,nitroethane, d-limonene, and 3-methoxybutyl acetate is set to 30 through70 wt % because, if the contents of the latter to too small, it is notpossible to increase the cleaning ability much, and thus it is notpossible to obtain a sufficient cleaning effect. Further, this isbecause, if the content of the latter is too large, the characteristicsof nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and 3-methoxybutyl acetatewill become too significant, and flammability will be imparted and thesolvent component will turn into a combustible.

Further, the third main structure of the present invention ischaracterized in including: (a) 30 through 60 wt % of1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane; and (b) 40 through 70 wt % of one kind ofsolvent or a mixed solvent including at least two kinds of solventsselected from among nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and3-methoxybutyl acetate. With this structure, it is possible tosufficiently support flux cleaning.

Further, the fourth main structure of the present invention ischaracterized in including: (a) 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane; and (c) apropylene glycol based solvent, and having no flammability.

Propylene glycol based solvents are such solvents formed by the presentinventor as to be suitable for increasing the cleaning ability of1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane. Propylene glycol based solvents have anextremely high dissolution ability and are superior in degreasingcleaning. Further, propylene glycol based solvents are not toxic andthus extremely safe and easy to handle. Further, they do not havechlorine or fluorine in their molecular structure and their ozonedepletion potential (ODP) and global warming potential (GDP) are small,and therefore, they have superior characteristics in that they areecological and clean. By mixing such a solvent to1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane, it is possible to greatly increase thecleaning ability, especially the degreasing-cleaning ability, and it ispossible to fully achieve sufficient performances as various kinds ofcleaners.

Propylene glycol based solvents, however, have a drawback in that theyhave flammability and thus are combustibles. On the other hand,1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane has no flammability and is anon-combustible. Therefore, through mixing the former with thesenon-combustible solvents, the solvent composition can be made into asafe non-combustible that has no flammability.

Further, the fifth main structure of the present invention ischaracterized in including: (a) 10 through 80 wt % of1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane; and (c) 20 through 90 wt % of one kind orat least two kinds of propylene glycol based solvents.

The range of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane is set to 10 through 80 wt %and the range of the propylene glycol based solvent is set to 20 through90 wt % because, if the contents of the propylene glycol based solventis too small, the cleaning ability will not improve much, and thus it isnot possible to obtain a sufficient cleaning effect. Further, this isbecause, if the content of the propylene glycol based solvent is toolarge, there is a possibility that flammability will be imparted to thesolvent composition and it will turn into a combustible. By setting theblending amount as described above, it is possible to obtain a solventcomposition for cleaning that has a sufficient cleaning ability but hasnot flammability.

Further, the sixth main structure of the present invention ischaracterized in including: (a) 10 through 70 wt % of1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane; and (c) 30 through 90 wt % of one kind orat least two kinds of propylene glycol based solvents. With thisstructure, it is possible to sufficiently support flux cleaning.

Further, in the fourth through sixth main structures of the presentinvention, it is characteristic that (d) at least one kind of solventselected from among nitromethane, nitroethane, 3-methoxybutyl acetate,3-methoxy-1-butanol, and d-limonene is included.

Further, in the fourth through sixth main structures of the presentinvention, it is characteristic that (d) at least 5 wt % of at least onekind of solvent selected from among nitromethane, nitroethane,3-methoxybutyl acetate, 3-methoxy-1-butanol, and d-limonene is included.

By including nitromethane, nitroethane, 3-methoxybutyl acetate,3-methoxy-1-butanol, or d-limonene as explained above, it is possible tofurther increase the dissolution ability, and thus it is possible tofully achieve a superior cleaning ability.

<BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION>

An embodiment of a solvent composition for cleaning according to thepresent invention will be described below. The solvent composition forcleaning according to the present invention includes the following fivetypes:

[1] a solvent composition for cleaning that has no flammability and thatincludes (a) 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane and (b) at least one kind ofsolvent selected from among nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and3-methoxybutyl acetate;

[2] a solvent composition for cleaning that includes (a) 30 through 70wt % of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane and (b) 30 through 70 wt % of onekind of solvent or a mixed solvent including at least two kinds ofsolvents selected from among nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and3-methoxybutyl acetate;

[3] a solvent composition for cleaning that includes (a) 30 through 60wt % of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane and (b) 40 through 70 wt % of onekind of solvent or a mixed solvent including at least two kinds ofsolvents selected from among nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and3-methoxybutyl acetate;

[4] a solvent composition for cleaning that has no flammability and thatincludes (a) 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane and (c) a propylene glycolbased solvent;

[5] a solvent composition for cleaning that includes (a) 10 through 80wt % 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane and (c) 20 through 90 wt % of one kindor at least two kinds of propylene glycol based solvents;

[6] a solvent composition for cleaning that includes (a) 10 through 70wt % of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane and (c) 30 through 90 wt % of onekind or at least two kinds of propylene glycol based solvents;

[7] a solvent composition for cleaning that includes, in the solventcomposition for cleaning according to [4] through [6], (d) at least onekind of solvent selected from among nitromethane, nitroethane,3-methoxybutyl acetate, 3-methoxy-1-butanol, and d-limonene.

As for nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, 3-methoxybutyl acetate, or3-methoxy-1-butanol in the solvent compositions for cleaning accordingto [1] through [3], [6], and [7], it is only necessary for at least onekind of solvent from among the above to be mixed; however, it isneedless to say that two or more types can be selected from among theabove and mixed.

As for the mixing amount of nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and3-methoxybutyl acetate in the solvent composition for cleaning accordingto [7], it is preferable to set the lower limit value thereof to atleast 5 wt % because sufficient improvement in cleaning ability cannotbe accomplished if the amount is too small. Further, since there is apossibility that flammability will arise if the mixing amount of thesolvent is too large an amount, it is preferable to appropriately mixthe solvent to an extent that flammability will be imparted. Further,since the solvents mentioned above are expensive compared to propyleneglycol based solvents, it is preferable to keep the usage amount thereofas low as possible.

Specifically, the propylene glycol based solvents used in the solventcompositions for cleaning according to [4] through [7] include, forexample: propylene glycol methyl ether [PM] (boiling point: 120° C.,flash point : 34° C.); dipropylene glycol methyl ether [DPM] (boilingpoint: 188° C., flash point: 79° C.); tripropylene glycol methyl ether[TPM] (boiling point: 242° C., flash point: 122° C.); propylene glycoln-butyl ether [PnB] (boiling point: 170° C., flash point: 62° C.);dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether [DPnB] (boiling point: 229° C., flashpoint: 106° C.); tripropylene glycol n-butyl ether (boiling point: 274°C., flash point: 138° C.); propylene glycol methyl ether acetate [PMA](boiling point: 146° C., flash point: 46.5° C.); propylene glycoldiacetate [PGDA] (boiling point: 190° C., flash point: 93° C.);propylene glycol phenyl ether [PPh] (boiling point: 243° C., flashpoint: 121° C.); and propylene glycol monoethyl ether acetate (boilingpoint: 158° C., flash point: 53° C.). In terms of the propylene glycolbased solvent, one kind may be mixed alone or several types may be mixedin combination.

Further, as for 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane, if the object to be cleanedis made of iron, zinc, aluminum, copper, brass, etc. when it is used forcleaning in a heated state or as steam, there are cases in which itbecomes unstable because of an influence caused by the metal. Therefore,it is preferably to add, as a stabilizer, at least one kind of compoundselected from nitro compounds, phenols, amines, ethers, amylenes,epoxides, or triazoles. Specifically, there are the following asstabilizers: epoxides such as propylene oxide, 1,2-butylene oxide, andglycidol; phosphites such as dimethyl phosphite, diisopropyl phosphite,and diphenyl phosphite; thiophosphites such as trilauryltrithiophosphite; phosphine sulfphides such as triphenoxyphosphinesulphide and trimethylphosphine sulphide; boron compounds such as boricacid, triethyl borate, triphenyl borate, phenylboronic acid, anddiphenylboronic acid; phenols such as 2,6-di-tert-butyl-para-cresol;nitroalkanes such as nitromethane and nitroethane; acrylic esters suchas methyl acrylate and ethyl acrylate; and also, dioxane, tert-butanol,pentaerythritol, and para-isopropenyl toluene. As for the amount ofaddition of these stabilizers, it is preferable to set the amount to0.01 through 5.00 wt % of the whole amount of the solvent compositionfor cleaning, although the amount is not to be particularly limited.

Further, as main applications of the solvent composition for cleaningaccording to the present invention, it is possible to name, for example:resist removing agents, flux cleaners, degreasing cleaners for oils andfats etc., buffing cleaners, dissolution agents for adhesive agents(such as urethane, epoxy, and silicone), solvents for dry cleaning,removing agents for grease, oil, wax, ink etc., solvents for paint,extractants, cleaners for various articles made of glass, ceramics,rubber, metal etc. and particularly for IC parts, electrical equipments,precision equipments, optical lenses, etc., or water removing agents.

Further, in terms of the cleaning method to which the solventcomposition for cleaning according to the present invention can beapplied, it can be applied to, for example, manual wiping, immersion,spraying, ultrasonic cleaning, steam cleaning, and cleaning of nozzlesof devices for filling adhesive agents (such as urethane, epoxy, andsilicone) as well as to other general cleaning.

<<Machine Oil Cleaning Test (1)>>

In this test, test pieces made of SUS-304 (length 25 mm×width 30mm×thickness 2 mm) were prepared, and, after immersing these test piecesinto machine oil (CQ-30: made by Nippon Oil Co., Ltd.), they wereimmersed into each cleaning fluid for approximately 3 minutes. Aftersubjecting the test pieces to a drying process, the cleansing state ofthe test pieces was studied. Solvents for cleaning obtained by mixingeach of nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and 3-methoxybutylacetate (3-MBA) to 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365 mfc) were used. Thefollowing table 1 summaries the composition of each cleaning fluid andthe results of cleaning.

TABLE 1 MACHINE OIL CLEANING TEST 1 (365mfc, nitroethane, nitromethane,d-limonene, 3-MBA) nitro- 365mfc nitroethane methane d-limonene 3-MBAcleaning (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) ability A 80 20 — — — X B 7525 — — — X C 70 30 — — — ◯ D 65 35 — — — ◯ E 60 40 — — — ◯ F 50 50 — — —◯ G 80 — 20 — — X H 75 — 25 — — X I 70 — 30 — — ◯ J 65 — 35 — — ◯ K 60 —40 — — ◯ L 50 — 50 — — ◯ M 80 — — 20 — X N 75 — — 25 — X O 70 — — 30 — ◯P 65 — — 35 — ◯ Q 60 — — 40 — ◯ R 50 — — 50 — ◯ S 80 — — — 20 X T 75 — —— 25 X U 70 — — — 30 ◯ V 65 — — — 35 ◯ W 60 — — — 40 ◯ Y 50 — — — 50 ◯◯: good X: cleaning effect small 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane(C₄H₅F₅) 3-MBA: 3-methoxybutyl acetate

Further, a solvent obtained by mixing propylene glycol methyl ether[PM], as a propylene glycol based solvent, to1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365 mfc), a solvent obtained by mixingpropylene glycol n-butyl ether [PnB], and a solvent obtained by mixingdipropylene glycol n-butyl ether [DPnB] were also studied, respectively.The test results are described in the following tables 2 through 4.

TABLE 2 MACHINE OIL CLEANING TEST 2 (365mfc, PM) A B C D E F G H I J365mfc (wt %) 100 90 85 80 70 60 50 30 20 10 PM (wt %) 0 10 15 20 30 4050 70 80 90 cleaning results X X X ◯ ◯ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ X: cleaning effectsmall ◯: good ⊚: very good 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅)PM: propylene glycol methyl ether

TABLE 3 MACHINE OIL CLEANING TEST 3 (365mfc, PnB) A B C D E F G H I J365mfc (wt %) 100 90 85 80 70 60 50 30 20 10 PnB (wt %) 0 10 15 20 30 4050 70 80 90 cleaning results X X X ◯ ◯ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ X: cleaning effectsmall ◯: good ⊚: very good 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅)PnB: propylene glycol n-butyl ether

TABLE 4 MACHINE OIL CLEANING TEST 4 (365mfc, DPnB) A B C D E F G H I J365mfc (wt %) 100 90 85 80 70 60 50 30 20 10 DPnB (wt %) 0 10 15 20 3040 50 70 80 90 cleaning results X X X ◯ ◯ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ X: cleaning effectsmall ◯: good ⊚: very good 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅)DPnB: dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether

From these test results, it has been confirmed that the cleaning abilityincreases and cleaning of machine oil becomes possible by mixingnitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, 3-methoxybutyl acetate, or apropylene glycol based solvent to 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane. Further,in this case, it was found that it is necessary to set the mixing amountof nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and 3-methoxybutyl acetate tobe at least 30 wt %. Further, it was found that it is necessary to setthe mixing amount of the propylene glycol based solvents to be at least20 wt %.

<<Flux Cleaning Test (1)>>

In this test, flux (TAMURA F-AL-4 made by TAMURA Corporation) wasapplied to the whole surface of a printed wiring board for testing, and,after subjecting it to a burning process in an electric furnace atapproximately 200° C. for approximately 2 minutes, it was immersed intoa cleaning fluid for approximately 3 minutes. Then, after subjecting theprinting wiring board to a drying process, the cleansing state wasexamined. In terms of the cleaning fluid, tests were conducted forfluids obtained by mixing each of nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene,and 3-methoxybutyl acetate (3-MBA) to 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc), and for fluids obtained by mixing, as a propylene glycol basedsolvent, each of propylene glycol methyl ether [PM], propylene glycoln-butyl ether [PnB], or dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether [DPnB]. Thetest results are described in table 5 through table 8 below.

TABLE 5 Flux Cleaning Test 1 (365mfc, nitroethane, nitromethane,d-limonene, 3-MBA) nitro- 365mfc nitroethane methane d-limonene 3-MBAcleaning (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) ability A 80 20 — — — X C 7030 — — — X D 65 35 — — — X E 60 40 — — — ◯ E 50 50 — — — ◯ F 40 60 — — —◯ G 30 70 — — — ◯ H 20 80 — — — ◯ I 80 — 20 — — X J 70 — 30 — — X K 65 —35 — — X L 60 — 40 — — ◯ M 50 — 50 — — ◯ N 40 — 60 — — ◯ O 30 — 70 — — ◯P 20 — 80 — — ◯ Q 80 — — 20 — X R 70 — — 30 — X S 65 — — 35 — X T 60 — —40 — ◯ U 50 — — 50 — ◯ V 40 — — 60 — ◯ W 30 — — 70 — ◯ X 20 — — 80 — ◯ Y10 — — 90 — ◯ Z 5 — — 95 — ◯ AA 80 — — — 20 X AB 70 — — — 30 X AC 65 — —— 35 X AD 60 — — — 40 ◯ AE 50 — — — 50 ◯ AF 40 — — — 60 ◯ AG 30 — — — 70◯ AH 20 — — — 80 ◯ AI 10 — — — 90 ◯ ◯: good X: cleaning effect small365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) 3-MBA: 3-methoxybutylacetate

TABLE 6 FLUX CLEANING TEST 2 (365mfc, PM) A B C D E F G H I J 365mfc (wt%) 100 90 80 75 70 60 55 50 40 30 PM (wt %) 0 10 20 25 30 40 45 50 60 70cleaning results X X X X ◯ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ X: cleaning effect small ◯: good ⊚:very good 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) PM: propyleneglycol methyl ether

TABLE 7 FLUX CLEANING TEST 3 (365mfc, PnB) A B C D E F G H I J 365mfc(wt %) 100 90 80 75 70 60 55 50 40 30 PnB (wt %) 0 10 20 25 30 40 45 5060 70 cleaning results X X X X ◯ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ X: cleaning effect small ◯:good ⊚: very good 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) PnB:propylene glycol n-butyl ether

TABLE 8 FLUX CLEANING TEST 4 (365mfc, DPnB) A B C D E F G H I J 365mfc(wt %) 100 90 80 75 70 60 50 30 20 10 DPnB (wt %) 0 10 20 25 30 40 50 7080 90 cleaning results X X X X ◯ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ X: cleaning effect small ◯:good ⊚: very good 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) DPnB:dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether

From these test results, it has been confirmed that the cleaning abilityincreases and cleaning of flux becomes possible by mixing eithernitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, 3-methoxybutyl acetate, or apropylene glycol based solvent. Further, it has been confirmed that itis necessary to mix at least 40 wt % of nitromethane, nitroethane,d-limonene, or 3-methoxybutyl acetate. Further, it has been confirmedthat it is necessary to mix at least 30 wt % of propylene glycol basedsolvents.

<<Flammability Test>>

In this test, the flammability was studied for when each ofnitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, 3-methoxybutyl acetate, or apropylene glycol based solvent was mixed to 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane.As described above, 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane has no flammability andis a non-combustible, were has nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene,3-methoxybutyl acetate, and propylene glycol based solvents haveflammability and are combustibles; therefore, when these are mixed,there is a possibility that the solvent may turn into a combustible.Therefore, in order to keep the flammability from being imparted, theappropriate mixing amount for nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene,3-methoxybutyl acetate, or the propylene glycol based solvents wasstudied.

Here, in terms of cleaning fluid, fluid obtained by mixing each ofnitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and 3-methoxybutyl acetate to1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane, and fluid obtained by mixing, as apropylene glycol based solvent, each of propylene glycol methyl ether[PM], propylene glycol n-butyl ether [PnB], or dipropylene glycoln-butyl ether [DPnB] were prepared, and the relationship between themixing amount and the flammability of the above was studied. The testresults are shown in the following tables 9 through 12. Note that theflammability was studied according to the Tag closed cup method.

TABLE 9 FLAMMABILITY TEST 1 (365mfc, nitroethane, nitromethane,d-limonene, 3-MBA) nitro- 365mfc nitroethane methane d-limonene 3-MBAflamma- (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) bility A 70 30 — — — no B 6040 — — — no C 50 50 — — — no D 40 60 — — — no E 30 70 — — — no F 20 80 —— — yes G 10 90 — — — yes H 70 — 30 — — no I 60 — 40 — — no J 50 — 50 —— no K 40 — 60 — — no L 30 — 70 — — no M 20 — 80 — — no N 10 — 90 — —yes O 70 — — 30 — no P 60 — — 40 — no Q 50 — — 50 — no R 40 — — 60 — noS 30 — — 70 — no T 20 — — 80 — no U 10 — — 90 — no V 5 — — 95 — yes W 70— — — 30 no Y 60 — — — 40 no Z 50 — — — 50 no AA 40 — — — 60 no AB 30 —— — 70 no AC 20 — — — 80 no AD 10 — — — 90 no AE 5 — — — 95 yes 365mfc:1,1.1.3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) 3-MBA: 3-methoxybutyl acetate

TABLE 10 FLAMMABILITY TEST 2 (365mfc. PM) A B C D E F G H I J 365mfc (wt%) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 25 20 10 PM (wt %) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 75 80 90flammability no no no no no no no no yes yes 365mfc:1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) PM: propylene glycol methyl ether

TABLE 11 FLAMMABILITY TEST 3 (365mfc, PnB) A B C D E F G H I J 365mfc(wt %) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 5 PnB (wt %) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8090 95 flammability no no no no no no no no no yes 365mfc:1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) PnB: propylene glycol n-butyl ether

TABLE 12 FLAMMABILITY TEST 4 (365mfc, DPnB) A B C D E F G H I J 365mfc(wt %) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 5 DPnB (wt %) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8090 95 flammability no no no no no no no no no yes 365mfc:1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) DPnB: dipropylene glycol n-butylether

From these test results, it was found that, since flammability starts tobe imparted at 80 wt % or more for nitromethane and nitroethane and at95 wt % or more for d-limonene and 3-methoxybutyl acetate (3-MBA), it isnecessary to set the content of nitromethane and nitroethane to be 70 wt% or lower and the content of d-limonene and 3-methoxybutyl acetate(3-MBA) to be 90 wt % or lower in order to keep the solvent frompossessing flammability.

Further, as for propylene glycol methyl ether [PM], it was found thatflammability is imparted when 80 wt % or more of this is mixed. Further,as for propylene glycol n-butyl ether [PnB] and dipropylene glycoln-butyl ether [DPnB], it was found that flammability is imparted when 95wt % or more of this is mixed. From the above, it was found that it isnecessary to keep the mixing amount to 75 wt % or lower for propyleneglycol methyl ether [PM] and 90 wt % or lower for propylene glycoln-butyl ether [PnB] or dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether [DPnB] in orderto keep flammability from being imparted due to mixing of propyleneglycol based solvents.

<<Machine Oil Cleaning Test (2)>>

Next, a test for examining the performance to clean machine oil for whennitromethane, nitroethane, 3-methoxybutyl acetate, 3-methoxy-1-butanol,or d-limonene is mixed to a mixed solvent of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutaneand a propylene glycol based solvent will be described. In order toascertain the improvement in cleaning ability caused by mixing of thesesolvents, in this test, a case in which the mixing amount of propyleneglycol based solvent is 10 wt % or lower, in which case the cleaningeffect was not so favorable, has been adopted for examination.

In the same way as the test described above, the test was carried out bypreparing test pieces made of SUS-304 (length 25 mm×width 30mm×thickness 2 mm), immersing these test pieces into machine oil (CQ-30:made by Nippon Oil Co., Ltd.), then immersing them into each cleaningfluid for approximately 3 minutes, then subjecting the test pieces to adrying process, and then examining the cleansing state of the testpieces. The test results are shown in the following tables 13 through15.

TABLE 13 MACHINE OIL CLEANING TEST 5 (365mfc, PM, nitroethane,nitromethane, 3-MBA, 3-M-1-B, d-limonene) nitro- nitro- d- 365mfc PMmethane ethane 3-MBA 3-M-1-B limonene (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %)(wt %) (wt %) results A 85 10 5 — — — — ◯ B 85 5 10 — — — — ⊚ C 90 5 5 —— — — X D 85 10 — 5 — — — ◯ E 85 5 — 10 — — — ⊚ F 90 5 — 5 — — — X G 8510 — — 5 — — ◯ H 85 5 — — 10 — — ⊚ I 90 5 — — 5 — — X J 85 10 — — — 5 —◯ K 85 5 — — — 10 — ⊚ L 90 5 — — — 5 — X M 85 10 — — — — 5 ◯ N 85 5 — —— — 10 ◯ O 90 5 — — — — 5 X X: cleaning effect small ◯: good ⊚: verygood 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) PM: propylene glycolmethyl ether 3-MBA: 3-methoxybutyl acetate 3-M-1-B: 3-methoxy-1-butanol

TABLE 14 MACHINE OIL CLEANING TEST 6 (365mfc, PnB, nitroethane,nitromethane, 3-MBA, 3-M-1-B, d-limonene) nitro- nitro- d- 365mfc PnBmethane ethane 3-MBA 3-M-1-B limonene (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %)(wt %) (wt %) results A 85 10 5 — — — — ◯ B 85 5 10 — — — — ⊚ C 90 5 5 —— — — X D 85 10 — 5 — — — ◯ E 85 5 — 10 — — — ⊚ F 90 5 — 5 — — — X G 8510 — — 5 — — ◯ H 85 5 — — 10 — — ⊚ I 90 5 — — 5 — — X J 85 10 — — — 5 —◯ K 85 5 — — — 10 — ⊚ L 90 5 — — — 5 — X M 85 10 — — — — 5 ◯ N 85 5 — —— — 10 ◯ O 90 5 — — — — 5 X X: cleaning effect small ◯: good ⊚: verygood 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) PnB: propylene glycoln-butyl ether 3-MBA: 3-methoxybutyl acetate 3-M-1-B: 3-methoxy-1-butanol

TABLE 15 MACHINE OIL CLEANING TEST 7 (365mfc, DPnB, nitroethane,nitromethane, 3-MBA, 3-M-1-B, d-limonene) nitro- nitro- d- 365mfc DPnBmethane ethane 3-MBA 3-M-1-B limonene (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %)(wt %) (wt %) results A 85 10 5 — — — — ◯ B 85 5 10 — — — — ⊚ C 90 5 5 —— — — X D 85 10 — 5 — — — ◯ E 85 5 — 10 — — — ⊚ F 90 5 — 5 — — — X G 8510 — — 5 — — ◯ H 85 5 — — 10 — — ⊚ I 90 5 — — 5 — — X J 85 10 — — — 5 —◯ K 85 5 — — — 10 — ⊚ L 90 5 — — — 5 — X M 85 10 — — — — 5 ◯ N 85 5 — —— — 10 ◯ O 90 5 — — — — 5 X X: cleaning effect small ◯: good ⊚: verygood 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) DPnB: dipropyleneglycol n-butyl ether 3-MBA: 3-methoxybutyl acetate 3-M-1-B:3-methoxy-1-butanol

From these test results, it has been confirmed that, by mixing eithernitromethane, nitroethane, 3-methoxybutyl acetate, 3-methoxy-1-butanol,or d-limonene, the cleaning ability improves compared to a case in whichonly propylene glycol based solvents are mixed. Further, as for themixing amount of these solvents, it was found that it is preferable toset the amount to at least 5 wt % or more when1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365 mfc) is 85 wt %.

<<Flux Cleaning Test (2)>>

Next, a flux cleaning test for a case in which nitromethane,nitroethane, 3-methoxybutyl acetate, 3-methoxy-1-butanol, or d-limoneneis mixed will be described. Also in this case, in order to ascertain theimprovement in cleaning ability caused by mixing of these solvents, acase in which the mixing amount of propylene glycol based solvent is 20wt % or lower, in which case the cleaning effect was not so favorable,has been adopted for examination.

In the same way as the test described above, in this test, flux (TAMURAF-AL-4 made by TAMURA Corporation) was applied to the whole surface of aprinted wiring board for testing, and, after subjecting it to a burningprocess in an electric furnace at approximately 200° C. forapproximately 2 minutes, it was immersed into the cleaning fluid forapproximately 3 minutes. Then, after subjecting the printed wiring boardto a drying process, the cleansing state was examined. The test resultsare shown in the following tables 16 through 18.

TABLE 16 FLUX CLEANING TEST 5 (365mfc, PM, nitroethane, nitromethane,3-MBA, 3-M-1-B, d-limonene) nitro- nitro- d- 365mfc PM methane ethane3-MBA 3-M-1-B limonene (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %)results A 75 20 5 — — — — X B 75 15 10 — — — — X C 75 10 15 — — — — ◯ D75 5 20 — — — — ◯ E 75 20 — 5 — — — X F 75 15 — 10 — — — X G 75 10 — 15— — — ◯ H 75 5 — 20 — — — ◯ I 75 20 — — 5 — — X J 75 15 — — 10 — — X K75 10 — — 15 — — ◯ L 75 5 — — 20 — — ◯ M 75 20 — — — 5 — X N 75 15 — — —10 — X O 75 10 — — — 15 — ◯ P 75 5 — — — 20 — ◯ Q 75 20 — — — — 5 X R 7515 — — — — 10 X S 75 10 — — — — 15 X T 75 5 — — — — 20 X X: cleaningeffect small ◯: good 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) PM:propylene glycol methyl ether 3-MBA: 3-methoxybutyl acetate 3-M-1-B:3-methoxy-1-butanol

TABLE 17 FLUX CLEANING TEST 6 (365mfc, PnB, nitroethane, nitromethane,3-MBA, 3-M-1-B, d-limonene) nitro- nitro- d- 365mfc PnB methane ethane3-MBA 3-M-1-B limonene (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %)results A 75 20 5 — — — — X B 75 15 10 — — — — X C 75 10 15 — — — — ◯ D75 5 20 — — — — ◯ E 75 20 — 5 — — — X F 75 15 — 10 — — — X G 75 10 — 15— — — ◯ H 75 5 — 20 — — — ◯ I 75 20 — — 5 — — X J 75 15 — — 10 — — X K75 10 — — 15 — — ◯ L 75 5 — — 20 — — ◯ M 75 20 — — — 5 — X N 75 15 — — —10 — X O 75 10 — — — 15 — ◯ P 75 5 — — — 20 — ◯ Q 75 20 — — — — 5 X R 7515 — — — — 10 X S 75 10 — — — — 15 X T 75 5 — — — — 20 X X: cleaningeffect small ◯: good 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) PnB:propylene glycol n-butyl ether 3-MBA: 3-methoxybutyl acetate 3-M-1-B:3-methoxy-1-butanol

TABLE 18 FLUX CLEANING TEST 7 (365mfc, DPnB, nitroethane, nitromethane,3-MBA, 3-M-1-B, d-limonene) nitro- nitro- d- 365mfc DPnB methane ethane3-MBA 3-M-1-B limonene (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %)results A 75 20 5 — — — — X B 75 15 10 — — — — X C 75 10 15 — — — — ◯ D75 5 20 — — — — ◯ E 75 20 — 5 — — — X F 75 15 — 10 — — — X G 75 10 — 15— — — ◯ H 75 5 — 20 — — — ◯ I 75 20 — — 5 — — X J 75 15 — — 10 — — X K75 10 — — 15 — — ◯ L 75 5 — — 20 — — ◯ M 75 20 — — — 5 — X N 75 15 — — —10 — X O 75 10 — — — 15 — ◯ P 75 5 — — — 20 — ◯ Q 75 20 — — — — 5 X R 7515 — — — — 10 X S 75 10 — — — — 15 X T 75 5 — — — — 20 X X: cleaningeffect small ◯: good 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) DPnB:dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether 3-MBA: 3-methoxybutyl acetate 3-M-1-B:3-methoxy-1-butanol

From these test results, it has been confirmed that, by mixing eithernitromethane, nitroethane, 3-methoxybutyl acetate, or3-methoxy-1-butanol, the cleaning ability improves compared to a case inwhich only propylene glycol based solvent(s) (PM, PnB, DPnB) are mixed.Further, as for the mixing amount of nitromethane, nitroethane,3-methoxybutyl acetate, or 3-methoxy-1-butanol, it has been confirmedthat it is preferable to set the amount to 15 wt % or more when1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365 mfc) is 75 wt %. Note that it was notpossible to obtain favorable results for d-limonene.

<<Influence on Plastics, Rubbers, Etc.>>

Next, a test for examining the influence of the solvent composition forcleaning according to the present invention on, for example, variouskinds of plastics and rubbers was carried out. In this test, soft vinylchloride, hard vinyl chloride, polycarbonate (PC), acrylic resin, nylon66 (registered trademark), polyacetal, polyurethane resin, phenolicresin, epoxy resin, melamine resin, urea resin, polyethlyene, andpolypropylene were prepared as the plastics, fluoro rubber, chloroprenerubber, silicone rubber, urethane rubber, SBR, natural rubber, and butylrubber were prepared as the rubbers, and a test of immersing each ofthem into the cleaning fluid for approximately 6 hours at ordinarytemperature was carried out. Then, a drying process was performed andthe presence or absence of influence was studied. The test results areshown in the following tables 19 through 22.

TABLE 19 INFLUENCE ON PLASTICS, RUBBERS, ETC. 1 (365mfc, nitroethane,nitromethane) A B C D E F G H I J 365mfc (wt %) 70 60 50 40 30 70 60 5040 30 nitroethane (wt %) 30 40 50 60 70 — — — — — nitromethane (wt %) —— — — — 30 40 50 60 70 vinyl chloride (soft) ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ X X X vinylchloride (hard) ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ X X X polycarbonate ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ X X Xacrylic resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ nylon 66 ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯polyacetal ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polyurethane resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯phenolic resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ epoxy resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯melamine resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ urea resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯polyethylene ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polypropylene ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯fluoro rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ chloroprene rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ ◯ X Xsilicone rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ urethane rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯SBR ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ ◯ X X natural rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ ◯ X X butyl rubber◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯: no influence X: having influence 365mfc:1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅)

TABLE 20 INFLUENCE ON PLASTICS, RUBBERS, ETC. 2 (365mfc, d-limonene,3-MBA) A B C D E F G H I J 365mfc (wt %) 70 60 50 40 30 70 60 50 40 30d-limonene (wt %) 30 40 50 60 70 — — — — — 3-MBA (wt %) — — — — — 30 4050 60 70 vinyl chloride (soft) ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ X X X vinyl chloride (hard)◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ X X X polycarbonate ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ X X X acrylic resin ◯ ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ nylon 66 ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polyacetal ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯◯ ◯ polyurethane resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ phenolic resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯◯ ◯ ◯ epoxy resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ melamine resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯urea resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polyethylene ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯polypropylene ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ fluoro rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯chloroprene rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ ◯ X X silicone rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯◯ urethane rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ SBR ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ ◯ X X naturalrubber ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ ◯ X X butyl rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯ ◯ ◯ X X ◯: noinfluence X: having influence 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane(C₄H₅F₅) 3-MBA: 3-methoxybutyl acetate

TABLE 21 INFLUENCE ON PLASTICS, RUBBERS, ETC. 3 (365mfc, PM, PnB) A B CD E F G H I J K L M N N 365mfc (wt %) 80 70 60 50 40 30 25 80 70 60 5040 30 20 10 PM (wt %) 20 30 40 50 60 70 75 — — — — — — — — PnB (wt %) —— — — — — — 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 vinyl chloride (soft) ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ vinyl chloride (hard) ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯polycarbonate ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ acrylic resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ nylon 66 ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polyacetal ◯ ◯ ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polyurethane resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯phenolic resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ epoxy resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ melamine resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ urea resin ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polyethylene ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯polypropylene ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ fluoro rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ chloroprene rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯silicone rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ urethane rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ SBR ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ natural rubber ◯ ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ butyl rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯:no influence X: having influence 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane(C₄H₅F₅) PM: propylene glycol methyl ether PnB: propylene glycol n-butylether

TABLE 22 INFLUENCE ON PLASTICS, RUBBERS, ETC. 4 (365mfc, DPnB) A B C D EF G H 365mfc (wt %) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 DPnB (wt %) 20 30 40 50 6070 80 90 vinyl chloride (soft) ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ vinyl chloride (hard) ◯ ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polycarbonate ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ acrylic resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯nylon 66 ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polyacetal ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polyurethane resin ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ phenolic resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ epoxy resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯melamine resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ urea resin ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polyethylene ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ polypropylene ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ fluoro rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯◯ chloroprene rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ silicone rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯urethane rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ SBR ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ natural rubber ◯ ◯ ◯◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ butyl rubber ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯: no influence X: havinginfluence 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (C₄H₅F₅) DPnB: dipropyleneglycol n-butyl ether

From these test results, it was confirmed that there is no possibilitythat the solvent composition for cleaning according to the presentinvention will have a bad influence on the various kinds of plastics orrubbers.

<<Metal Corrosion Test>>

In this test, according to JIS-K1600, aluminum pieces (JIS-H-4000,A1100P) were arranged in both the liquid phase portion and the gas phaseportion of the cleaning fluid after cleaning, and the state of corrosionof metal after approximately 48 hours was studied. The results are shownin the following tables 23 and 24.

TABLE 23 METAL CORROSION TEST 1 (365mfc, nitroethane, nitromethane,d-limonene, 3-MBA) nitro- nitro- 365mfc ethane methane d-limonene 3-MBA(wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) results A 70 30 — — — ◯ B 60 40 — — —◯ C 50 50 — — — ◯ D 40 60 — — — ◯ E 30 70 — — — ◯ F 70 — 30 — — ◯ G 60 —40 — — ◯ H 50 — 50 — — ◯ I 40 — 60 — — ◯ J 30 — 70 — — ◯ K 70 — — 30 — ◯L 60 — — 40 — ◯ M 50 — — 50 — ◯ N 40 — — 60 — ◯ O 30 — — 70 — ◯ P 70 — —— 30 ◯ Q 60 — — — 40 ◯ R 50 — — — 50 ◯ S 40 — — — 60 ◯ T 30 — — — 70 ◯X: CORROSION ◯: NO CORROSION 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane(C₄H₅F₅) 3-MBA: 3-methoxybutyl acetate

TABLE 24 METAL CORROSION TEST 2 (365mfc, PM, PnB, DPnB) 365mfc PM PnBDPnB (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) results A 80 20 — — ◯ B 60 40 — — ◯ C50 50 — — ◯ D 40 60 — — ◯ E 30 70 — — ◯ F 25 75 — — ◯ G 80 — 20 — ◯ H 60— 40 — ◯ I 50 — 50 — ◯ J 30 — 70 — ◯ K 20 — 80 — ◯ L 10 — 90 — ◯ M 80 —— 20 ◯ N 60 — — 40 ◯ O 50 — — 50 ◯ P 30 — — 70 ◯ Q 20 — — 80 ◯ R 10 — —90 ◯ X: CORROSION ◯: NO CORROSION 365mfc: 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane(C₄H₅F₅) PM: propylene glycol methyl ether PnB: propylene glycol n-butylether DPnB: dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether

From these test results, it was confirmed that none of the solventcompositions for cleaning according to the present invention has no suchbed influence as to make metal corrode.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

According to the first solvent composition for cleaning of the presentinvention, by including nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and/or3-methoxybutyl acetate in 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane, it is possible togreatly increase the cleaning ability, especially thedegreasing-cleaning ability, and it is possible to fully achievesufficient performances in various kinds of cleaning. Further, since thesolvent composition does not have flammability, it does not fall withinhazardous materials; therefore, it is safe and easy to handle. Also, itsozone depletion potential (ODP) and its global warming potential (GWP)are small, and thus it is ecological and clean.

Further, according to the second solvent composition for cleaning of thepresent invention, by including (a) 30 through 70 wt % of1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane and (b) 30 through 70 wt % of one kind ofsolvent or a mixed solvent including at least two kinds of solventsselected from among nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and3-methoxybutyl acetate, it is possible to avoid a situation in which themixing amount of nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, or3-methoxybutyl acetate is too small and a sufficient increase incleaning ability cannot be achieved. Also, it is possible to prevent asituation in which the mixing amount of these solvents is too large andflammability is imparted.

Further, according to the third solvent composition for cleaning of thepresent invention, by including one kind of solvent or a mixed solventincluding at least two kinds of solvents selected from amongnitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and 3-methoxybutyl acetate withina range of 40 through 70 wt %, it is possible to sufficiently supportflux cleaning.

Further, according to the fourth solvent composition for cleaning of thepresent invention, by including 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane and apropylene glycol based solvent, it is possible to greatly increase thecleaning ability, especially the degreasing-cleaning ability, and it ispossible to fully achieve sufficient performances as various kinds ofcleaners. Further, propylene glycol based solvents are not toxic, andthus extremely safe and easy to handle. Also, they do not includechlorine or fluorine in their molecular structure and their ozonedepletion potential (ODP) and their global warming potential (GWP) aresmall. Therefore, they have superior characteristics in that they areecological and clean. Further, thanks to their being combined with1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane, it is possible to overcome the problem offlammability, which is a drawback of propylene glycol based solvent(s),and it is possible to make it into a non-combustible that is safe andhas no flammability.

Further, according to the fifth solvent composition for cleaning of thepresent invention, by adopting (a) 10 through 80 wt % of1,1,3,3,-pentafluorobutane and (c) 20 through 90 wt % of one kind or atleast two kinds of propylene glycol based solvents, it is possible toavoid a situation in which the mixing amount of the propylene glycolbased solvent(s) is too small and a sufficient increase in cleaningability cannot be achieved, and also, it is possible to prevent asituation in which the mixing amount of the propylene glycol basedsolvent(s) is too large and flammability is imparted.

Further, according to the sixth solvent composition for cleaning of thepresent invention, by including one kind or at least two kinds ofpropylene glycol based solvents within a range of 30 through 90 wt %, itis possible to sufficiently support flux cleaning.

Further, as for the fourth through sixth solvent compositions forcleaning, by including (d) at least one kind of solvent selected fromamong nitromethane, nitroethane, 3-methoxybutyl acetate,3-methoxy-1-butanol, and d-limonene, it is possible to further increasethe dissolution ability, and thus it is possible to fully achieve asuperior cleaning ability.

1. A solvent composition for cleaning including: (a) 30 through 70 wt %of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane; and (b) 30 through 70 wt % of one kindof solvent or a mixed solvent including at least two kinds of solventsselected from among nitromethane, nitroethane, d-limonene, and3-methoxybutyl acetate.
 2. A solvent composition for cleaning including:(a) 30 through 60 wt % of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane; and (b) 40through 70 wt % of one kind of solvent or a mixed solvent including atleast two kinds of solvents selected from among nitromethane,nitroethane, d-limonene, and 3-methoxybutyl acetate.